US quits ‘biased’ UN human rights council

 US quits 'biased' UN human rights council
 US quits 'biased' UN human rights council

US has pulled out of the United Nations Human Rights Council, calling it a “cesspool of political bias”. Nikki Haley, the US envoy to the UN, said it was a “hypocritical” body that “makes a mockery of human rights” Formed in 2006, the Geneva-based council has faced criticism in the past for allowing member countries with questionable human rights records.  But activists said the US move could hurt efforts to monitor and address human rights abuses around the world. Announcing the decision to quit the council, Ms Haley described the council as a “hypocritical and self-serving organisation” that displayed “unending hostility towards Israel”. She was speaking alongside US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who denounced the council as “a protector of human rights abusers”. This is just the latest rejection of multilateralism by the Trump administration, and will likely unsettle those who look to the United States to protect and promote human rights around the. The United States has always had a conflicting relationship with the UN Human Rights Council. The Bush Administration decided to boycott the council when it was created in 2006 for many of the same reasons cited by the Trump administration. The then UN ambassador was John Bolton – who is currently President Trump’s national security adviser and a strong critic of the UN.  It wasn’t until years later, in 2009, that the United States re-joined under the Obama administration. Many allies have tried to convince the United States to remain in the council. Even many who agree with Washington’s long standing criticisms of the body believe the United States should actively work to reform it from within, rather than disengaging.  The UN set up the council in 2006 to replace the UN
Commission on Human Rights, which faced widespread criticism for letting countries with poor human rights records become members. A group of 47 elected countries from different global regions serve for three-year terms on the council. The UNHRC meets three times a year, and reviews the human rights records of all UN members in a special process the council says gives countries the chance to say what they have done to improve human rights, known as the Universal Periodic Review.  The council also sends out independent experts and has set upcommissions of inquiry to report on human rights violations in countries including Syria, North Korea, Burundi, Myanmar and South Sudan.

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *